הוועד הציבורי נגד עינויים בישראל

In the two years following the High Court of Justice ruling, the premise that only by the use of torture enables the GSS to defend the state's security has been discredited. The source of this premise is rooted in the long years when the security services terrorized the courts, usually through confidential reports that were heard behind closed doors. Torture, house demolition, expulsion, detention without trial and land expropriation; the court bent before the security system and trampled on its way many principles of law, morality and justice. Only the years-long struggle carried out by many human rights organizations brought about the High Court of Justice decision, which is proving to be both moral and beneficial to Israel's security.
In addition, it can be learned from the achievements of similar organizations responsible for the security of other Western states that the development of improved methods of interrogation and the employment of high- quality staff in the security services has an overwhelming influence in the defense of these states from terror.
The state of Israel can learn from the example of England, a democratic country where the use of torture was stopped during the time of serious terrorist actions, which averaged 300 victims per month.